MoonBatman

I call on the power of the MoonBat. All College Professors, Art Directors, Newspaper Editors, Overpaid TV Reporters, Anyone else with a IQ of 80 or Below. Heed the call of MoonBatman.


Latest Right Wing Extremist Outrage Machine/Echo chamber and Donald Trump's smear of Saint and Rep. John Lewis that he lied when he said " this would be the first inauguration he wouldn’t be attending as a member of Congress. ".

MMFA/Politifact  False and Debunked. John Lewis's staff says he forgot that he boycotted George W. Bush's inauguration: "That was almost 20 years ago."

CLIMATE CHANGE, RIGHT WING HATE SPEECH AND THE NRA CAUSED THE OUT OF CONTROL TRUCK ATTACK IN NICE!

When will Progressives defend Katie Couric?

Progressives can not allow the Right to control the narrative on this like they did with the Duke Lacrosse and UVA rape cases.  The conventional wisdom that the Duke Lacrosse and UVA rape cases were hoaxes and not the truth that they were covered up by Right wing extremist rape apologists smears, victim blaming and victim shaming.

When are progressive lead by Media Matters and Thinkprogress going to push back at the latest Right wing smear against Katie Couric, Stephanie Soechtig and the excellent factual Gun Documentary Under the Gun  over a unintentional minor editing mistake using audio that was the result of illegal wiretapping/eavesdropping performed by Radical Far right Anti gun safety extremists.

The 8 second insignificant edit of the two-hour acclaimed above reproach Gun
Documentary Under the Gun film, that the NRA is unfairly fixated on, "did not represent editing someone’s sentences, there was no factual error, this is not a mistake that is a substantive mistake. It could have been avoided. This was a poor decision that was made and it involves silence.”

Progressive mikethegunguy points out that the answer inadvertently removed by the unintentional minor editing mistake was the stupid "usual mélange of gun-rights crap ... have been shown to be false in more peer-based research studies than I can count."  unintentional minor editing mistake that just skipped lame answers that were so obviously wrong "solipsistic arguments". 
"listening to the audio of what actually transpired strikes me as more revealing than what is in the film. One person at the table lamely tries to defend the rights for anyone to have a gun, while the others use solipsistic arguments to speak about how existing laws are sufficient, which clearly they are not. Had the film played the moment more truthfully, we would have learned more about how these people really feel, and we would be spared watching the grandstanding going on Fox News (among other outlets and websites) that inflates one mistake into a condemnation of the entire film."

CLIMATE CHANGE, RIGHT WING SPEECH AND THE NRA CAUSED PARIS ATTACK!

Support the Federal Law Enforcement Bill of Rights.

1) 1st Rule of Policing: Police have the right and the duty to go home at the end of each watch. It does not matter how many non-law enforcement personnel are injured or killed or have their “rights” violated to achieve this goal as Police are entitled to impunity for their violence and protection from harm above all others.
2) Sealing of all law enforcement records from the public.
3) Police are entitled to absolute privacy when performing their duties. Police should only be required to identify themselves only in the arrest warrant or report if used in court.
4) Police officers can seize and delete any video and/or audio of wiretapping/eavesdropping Police Officers in public as it violates their privacy and distracts from their duties and jeopardizes Officer safely.
A Automatic search warrant and SWAT raid is authorized for anyone in possession of video and/or audio of wiretapping/eavesdropping Police Officers in public.
5) Police officer statements override any video or audio evidence as the officers' reasonable perceptions are more accurate. Video or audio footage does not capture the physical struggle from the officers' perspective, nor does it capture the officers' reasonable, split-second decision-making and thought processes in tense circumstances. This is the case especially when the video or audio is gathered by illegally wiretapping/eavesdropping Police Officers in public.
6) Citizens must provide ID and must allow themselves to being searched by Law Enforcement when so ordered by Police.
7) Repeal Anti Police excessive force, false arrest and civil rights violations laws that jeopardize Officer safely.
8) Any videos from Police equipment should only be used in court and/or be released to the public with the approval of all police officers being filmed to protect their privacy.
9) Reporting and Statistics about Police misconduct, shootings, and use of SWAT should illegal to be collected or published as they may inflame anti police sentiment jeopardizing Officer safely. violating the Officers’ privacy and renders police vulnerable to unfounded scrutiny".
10) Police officer should be exempt from all making false statements laws
11) Police officers should only be tried by a special court composed only of Law Enforcement officers.
13) Qualified immunity should only be denied if the individual officer was sued previously for the same “unlawful actions or actions violating clearly established law.”
14) “Brady cops” do not exist. Perjury in previous cases should not be a factor in judging a officer’s truthfulness and violates their privacy
15) It is illegal to make a false accusation against a Police officer.
16) Police Dash Cam, Police and Jail surveillance video videos should only be used to protect Police, not as a internal affairs “gotcha-head hunter” tool.
17) Police officers accused of misconduct should notified of all incriminating evidence or witness statements, be able to review it without a investigator looking into their actions during that process and remain silent for a 72 hours cooling off period afterwards. Additionally the officer has 10 days to get an attorney before they can be questioned by superiors, An officer may not be investigated on a brutality accusation unless it was made within 90 days of the incident.
18) A complaint against a law enforcement officer that alleges brutality in the execution of the law enforcement officer's duties may not be investigated unless the complaint is sworn to, before an official authorized to administer oaths, by the aggrieved individual, a member of the aggrieved individual's immediate family. an individual with firsthand knowledge obtained because the individual was present at and observed the alleged incident or the parent or guardian of the minor child, if the alleged incident involves a minor child.
(19) Unless a complaint is filed within 90 days after the alleged brutality, an investigation that may lead to disciplinary action under this subtitle for brutality may not be initiated and an action may not be taken.
(20) Before an interrogation, the law enforcement officer under investigation shall be informed in writing of the nature of the investigation.
(21) The interrogation shall take place at the office of the command of the investigating officer or at the office of the local precinct or police unit in which the incident allegedly occurred, as designated by the investigating officer or at another reasonable and appropriate place.
The interrogation shall be conducted at a reasonable hour, preferably when the law enforcement officer is on duty and h) Conduct of interrogation.-
(22) All questions directed to the law enforcement officer under interrogation shall be asked by and through one interrogating officer during any one session of interrogation. (23) Each session of interrogation shall be for a reasonable period; and allow for personal necessities and rest periods as reasonably necessary. Threat of transfer, dismissal, or disciplinary action prohibited.- The law enforcement officer under interrogation may not be threatened with transfer, dismissal, or disciplinary action.
(24) A complete record shall be kept of the entire interrogation, including all recess periods, of the law enforcement officer. The record may be written, taped, or transcribed.
On completion of the investigation, and on request of the law enforcement officer under investigation or the law enforcement officer's counsel or representative, a copy of the record of the interrogation shall be made available at least 10 days before a hearing. 
(25) It is illegal to engage in Contempt of Cop behavior, taunting, provoking, disrespecting the law enforcement officer or questioning his knowledge of the Law.
(26) Amendment to the US Constitution that the Law Enforcement Bill of Rights. takes precedent over other "Civil Rights" in the Bill of Rights.

Support the law enforcement bill of rights.

Support the law enforcement bill of rights.
1) 1st Rule of Policing: Police have the right and the duty to go home at the end of each watch. It does not matter how many non-law enforcement personnel are injured or killed or have their “rights” violated to achieve this goal as Police are entitled to impunity for their violence and protection from harm above all others.
2) Sealing of all law enforcement records from the public.
3) Police are entitled to absolute privacy when performing their duties. Police should only be required to identify themselves only in the arrest warrant or report if used in court.
4) Automatic search warrant and SWAT raid for anyone in possession of video and/or audio of wiretapping/eavesdropping Police Officers in public.
5) Reporting and Statistics about Police misconduct, shooting, and use of SWAT should illegal to be collected or published as they may inflame anti police sentiment jeopardizing Officer safely and violating their privacy.
6) Citizens must provide ID and must allow themselves to being searched by Law Enforcement when so ordered by Police.
7) Repeal Anti Police excessive force, false arrest and civil rights violations laws that jeopardize Officer safely.
8) Police officers accused of misconduct should notified of all incriminating evidence or witness statements, be able to review it and remain silent for a 72 hours cooling off period afterwards. Additionally the officer has 10 days to get an attorney before they can be questioned by superiors, An officer may not be investigated on a brutality accusation unless it was made within 90 days of the incident.
9) Police officer statements override any video or audio evidence as the officers' reasonable perceptions are more accurate. Video or audio footage does not capture the physical struggle from the officers' perspective, nor does it capture the officers' reasonable, split-second decision-making and thought processes in tense circumstances. This is the case especially when the video or audio is gathered by illegally wiretapping/eavesdropping Police Officers in public.
10) Police officer should be exempt from all making false statements laws
11) Police officers should only be tried by a special court composed only of Law Enforcement officers.
13) Qualified immunity should only be denied if the individual officer was sued previously for the same “unlawful actions or actions violating clearly established law.”
14) “Brady cops” do not exist. Perjury in previous cases should not be a factor in judging a officer’s truthfulness and violates their privacy
15) It is illegal to make a false accusation against a Police officer or engage in behavior that displays Contempt of Cop behavior or disrespects the police officer.
16) Police Dash Cam, Police and Jail surveillance video videos should only be used to protect Police, not as a internal affairs “gotcha-head hunter” tool.
17) Any videos of Police should only be used in court and/or be released to the public with the approval of all police officers being filmed to protect their privacy.
18) Amendment to the US Constitution that the Police officer’s bill of rights takes precedent over other "Civil Rights" in the Bill of Rights.

A “Both Sides Do It” for the Ages

Nothing on MSNBC compares to this.
Not even  the false Wingnut claim of Maddow on MSNBC claiming that teabagger Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas) had some kind of prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing is as bad as that smear. She corrected it as a editing error

Katie Pavlich on Fox noise swiftboated the trained professionals of the NYPD claiming they "accidentally shot nine innocent bystanders on the streets of New York" because “they had never shot their guns in a situation before 'cause Michael Bloomberg doesn't let them practice.” . Does she not understand that Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly and Mayor Michael Bloomberg have said they believe the officers followed proper protocol. So the whole matter can be dropped like the Fast and Furious witch hunt.
Peace Out.




© 2006 MoonBatman | Blogger Templates by GeckoandFly.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.